Bag of Randomness

This entry was posted in Personal. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Bag of Randomness

  1. Andy says:

    Regarding drug testing for welfare recipients…I read an article a while back that did the math on this idea in Florida. The percentage of welfare recipients who actually abused drugs was so low that the cost of the testing exceeded the money saved by cutting off the people who tested positive. In other words, the state would actually lose money on the testing program, despite the common conservative assumption that many welfare recipients are on drugs.

  2. Gracie says:

    http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2012/11/pe

    "Something else from Florida’s experience is that it cost five times more to administer the program than it saved in taxpayer money. Looking at four months, from July to October, the ACLU found that $40,000 was saved from refusing benefits to those suspected of drug use. The cost of the drug exams over the same period was $245,000"

  3. RPM says:

    They would save more money by revamping the items allowed for purchase with Food Stamps. Cut out the ice cream, sodas, energy drinks, premium frozen food, ect.

    But this isn't about saving money, it's about forcing morality.

Comments are closed.