As always the cheapest method is taking preventitive measures. Not playing politics but the scandal plagued Interior Department's Minerals Management Service deemed it not necessary for oil companies to spend $500,000 on an acoustic trigger to shut the thing off…cheaper than $6 million/day that BP is currently spending..never mind the environmental disaster this is causing. Wall Street Journal explains it herehttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704…
As always the cheapest method is taking preventitive measures. Not playing politics but the scandal plagued Interior Department's Minerals Management Service deemed it not necessary for oil companies to spend $500,000 on an acoustic trigger to shut the thing off…cheaper than $6 million/day that BP is currently spending..never mind the environmental disaster this is causing. Wall Street Journal explains it herehttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704…
I wonder which method of the stopping the leaks is the cheapest.
As always the cheapest method is taking preventitive measures. Not playing politics but the scandal plagued Interior Department's Minerals Management Service deemed it not necessary for oil companies to spend $500,000 on an acoustic trigger to shut the thing off…cheaper than $6 million/day that BP is currently spending..never mind the environmental disaster this is causing. Wall Street Journal explains it herehttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704…
As always the cheapest method is taking preventitive measures. Not playing politics but the scandal plagued Interior Department's Minerals Management Service deemed it not necessary for oil companies to spend $500,000 on an acoustic trigger to shut the thing off…cheaper than $6 million/day that BP is currently spending..never mind the environmental disaster this is causing. Wall Street Journal explains it herehttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704…