BagOfNothing.com | Because that's all I have to offer

Palin and Supreme Court Cases

October 1st, 2008

I wonder if she would have been better off if she just said no rather than ramble on.

But for some reason, I have a feeling she’s going to do much better than expected on the debate.

Entry Filed under: Political

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. dan  |  October 2nd, 2008 at 10:36 am

    The problem is she would say to “no” for most questions. This strategy did not work that well for Alberto Gonzales who used the answer, “Senator, I have no recollection of that conversation” about a hundred times during his congressional testimony over prosecutor firings. That issue has since been turned over to an Independent Counsel.

    I think she should have said, ” I don’t know of any Supreme Court decisions but I have come up with a list of newpapers I read in answer to your question from a few days ago”.

Leave a Comment

hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Comments

  • dan: I am seriously going through charity fatigue. All of the charities I contribute to invariably send me a...
  • moldyhatespreXmas: SWEET JESUS THANK YOU!
  • Tammie Thomas: Which by the way.. the grower is a freind of mine… And… he did not need to be told that...
  • Tammie Thomas: Brent I appreciate your insight – What you must understand is that her comments to the public...
  • Jenny: Yay for the baby bump!